broad research question: How does society value punishment and what are the alternatives?

broad research question: How does society value punishment and what are the alternatives?

broad research question: How does society value punishment and what are the alternatives?

specific question: I could not clarify and I am not sure that I am right track, but I suggest about Indigenous people, for example, How are indigenous peoples treated in the criminal justice system? (Please help this clarify about this one!)

specific question: I could not clarify and I am not sure that I am right track, but I suggest about Indigenous people, for example, How are indigenous peoples treated in the criminal justice system? (Please help this clarify about this one!)

word limit: 1500 words

reference style: harvard style

broad research question: How does society value punishment and what are the alternatives?

specific question: I could not clarify and I am not sure that I am right track, but I suggest about Indigenous people, for example, How are indigenous peoples treated in the criminal justice system? (Please help this clarify about this one!)

and also,

You must clearly outline the significance of the problem and why it is important to criminological inquiry. This should be supported by a select overview of the literature to demonstrate how the project will contribute to gaps in criminological knowledge. When preparing your assessment you must include the following:

• Background to the topic you have selected: why is this topic important to contemporary criminological enquiry? What public concerns does it speak to?
• Provide an overview of select key literature (this means academic sources and depending on the topic it could include some policy literature
• Provide a statement of the gap or issue that your project will address.

——————–

Criteria:

• How well has the criminological issue been identified and articulated? (answers why it is an important problem that needs addressing + identifies gap)
• Does the lit review accurately / comprehensively reflect what we know about the problem?
• Ability to synthesise academic literature
• How robust are the theoretical foundations of the student’s argument or core message?
• How clear, concise, and logical is the writing?
• Is the research outline substantiated with adequate references and evidence?