Identify the economic, diplomatic and security policies pursued by the Clinton, Bush and Obama Administrations that sought to liberalize China
Campbell and Ratner argued in their Foreign Affairs article (July/August 2018) that U.S. diplomatic and political engagement with Beijing has not brought long expected political and economic openness to China. They also contend that neither military power nor regional balancing has stopped Beijing from seeking to displace the U.S. as the regional hegemon. Identify the economic, diplomatic and security policies pursued by the Clinton, Bush and Obama Administrations that sought to liberalize China’s internal development and external behaviour in support of the U.S.-led neoliberal global order. Refer to one of the following critiques of the Campbell and Ratner reading made by Wang Jisi, Stapleton Roy, Aaron Friedberg, Christensen & Kim, Nye or Li. In your opinion, which of these authors makes the most persuasive critique for or against Campbell and Ratner’s argument? Back up your point of view with supporting evidence.
Answer preview for Identify the economic, diplomatic and security policies pursued by the Clinton, Bush and Obama Administrations that sought to liberalize China
1442 Words