Explain one philosopher’s reasons for thinking that we lack sufficient evidence to conclude that the world we experience corresponds to and resembles a mind-independent physical world.

Explain one philosopher’s reasons for thinking that we lack sufficient evidence to conclude that the world we experience corresponds to and resembles a mind-independent physical world.

a) Explain one philosopher’s reasons for thinking that we lack sufficient evidence to conclude that the world we experience corresponds to and resembles a mind-independent physical world.
b) Raise one response to that claim, that is, explain some reasons for believing that we possess sufficient evidence to conclude that the world we experience corresponds to and resembles a mind-independent physical world.
c) Respond on behalf of the philosopher mentioned in (a) to the objection in (b). What additional arguments might that philosopher develop to address the specific challenge from (b)?

Solution preview for the order on Explain one philosopher’s reasons for thinking that we lack sufficient evidence to conclude that the world we experience corresponds to and resembles a mind-independent physical world.

APA

691 words