Discuss why it is important for a law enforcement officer to prove consent was voluntarily and knowingly given.

Discuss why it is important for a law enforcement officer to prove consent was voluntarily and knowingly given.

If you need any help and you did not find it the word documents use his book

Question 1

While a signed written document may provide some evidence that a consent to search was
voluntarily and knowingly given, it is neither required nor is it absolute proof. Discuss why it
is important for a law enforcement officer to prove consent was voluntarily and knowingly
given. What happens if a consent to search is not voluntary? 300 words

Question 2

Discuss Miranda v. Arizona. How did this case change the way law
enforcement interrogates suspects?
There is a common misconception that Miranda Warnings must be immediately
given to a person when they are placed under arrest. This is not true. A
suspect must be given Miranda Warnings before they are interrogated, not
interviewed. An interview is non-accusatory. An interrogation is accusatory.
Discuss why you think it is a common mistake for people to believe Miranda
Warnings should be given immediately after an arrest.  300 words

Solution preview for the order on discuss why it is important for a law enforcement officer to prove consent was voluntarily and knowingly given.

APA

791 words