Explain the paradox of analysis. Which solution to the paradox of analysis
1200-1800 worlds. JUST NEED choose ONE of the following topics.
Use question 4
Just need choose one of the following topic:
.(1) Explain Newcomb’s problem. Explain why the (unrestricted) rule of expected utility recommends 1-boxing while the rule of dominance recommends 2-boxing (provided there is no backwards causation). How would you choose and why?
(2) Explain the liar paradox. Why would banning self-referential statements not eliminate the liar paradox? Which solution to the liar paradox strikes you as plausible and why?
(3) Explain the sorites paradox. What is your favorite solution to the sorites paradox and why? What, if anything, is problematic about your favorite solution to the sorites paradox?
(4) Explain the paradox of analysis. Which solution to the paradox of analysis do you find most convincing? Explain the solution.
(5) Explain the distinction between a performative and a logical contradiction. Explain Moore’s paradox in its omissive and commissive form. Which solution to Moore’s paradox do you find most convincing? Explain the solution. Are there any problems with the solution of your choice and, if there are, how can they be dealt with? (Note: you do not have to discuss the knowledge version of Moore’s paradox.)
hermeneutic_circle chisholm__the_problem_of_the_criterion paradox_of_analysis _guidelines_on_writing_a_philosophy_paper (2) daly__the_paradox_of_analysis 
Solution preview for the order on explain the paradox of analysis. Which solution to the paradox of analysis
APA
1389 words