Global warming Rogerian Argument
Global warming Rogerian Argument
OVERVIEW
Part 2 asks you to formalize your Project 1 assignment by writing a 1,000 – 1,200-word Rogerian Argument. This essay introduces a controversial issue, identifies two stakeholders engaged in the issue who hold different stances on the issue, recognizes common ground between the two different stakeholders, exercises empathy in understanding the stakeholders’ positions, and determines a mutually beneficial compromise based on this common ground that may work towards resolving the issue.
SKILLS & STRATEGIES
This Part 2 assignment will help you to
reread, review, and analyze compiled current research and presented arguments
identify and develop organizational strategies that contribute to the effective delivery of information and presentation
demonstrate responsiveness to new information, ideas, circumstances, and perspectives through a process of re-evaluating ideas and/or approaches
synthesize disparate or conflicting thoughts when evaluating questions/problems to form cohesive and collaborative solutions
construct an introduction and solid thesis that is supported by credible and convincing evidence
adjust tone and language to present fair representations of each stakeholder’s narrative
write a conclusion that defends rationale for presented solutions
DESCRIPTION (AND STEP BY STEP)
Part 2 should be a fully-developed 1,000 – 1,200-word Rogerian Argument. This essay draft should include the following steps:
An introduction that clearly identifies both stakeholders, the controversial issue, and thesis that presents the point of contention between the stakeholders and explains a proposed compromise
Fair representation of the major stakeholders’ points and evidence that demonstrate your understanding of the value and circumstance of each position (empathy)
A discussion of what the two stakeholders have in common (common ground)
A single, feasible, and objective resolution that would benefit both stakeholders and potentially work to resolve the issue
A defense of why the resolution is workable for both stakeholders and in which contexts the compromise will work and satisfy each stakeholder
A conclusion that highlights the main points and considers forward-thinking ideas for research/action
A Works Cited page
Solution preview for the order on Global warming Rogerian Argument
APA
1236 words