Analyze Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders and explain how sexual harassment can lead to resignation that resulted in a constructive

Analyze Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders and explain how sexual harassment can lead to resignation that resulted in a constructive

Learning Goal: I’m working on a criminal justice case study and need a sample draft to help me learn.

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOS)

  • CLO7: Appraise issues involving wrongful termination, police corruption, and discrimination lawsuits.

MODULE LEARNING OUTCOMES (MLOS)

  • MLO3: Analyze court cases involving wrongful termination.
  • MLO4: Appraise court cases involving discrimination lawsuits against criminal justice agencies.

ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION / DELIVERABLE

Analyze Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders and explain how sexual harassment can lead to resignation that resulted in a constructive discharge. Using the Module 4 IRAC method, define what the issues were, what the rule was, how the case was analyzed and what were the results. Upon completion of the IRAC, read the article from NBC News, January 7, 2022, on alleged racial and gender discrimination. After reading the article, give your own conclusion on steps law enforcement agencies can take to prevent wrongful termination and in your opinion state whether Pennsylvania State Police could have prevented this suit. Support your position.

INSTRUCTIONS

When submitting your weekly assignment be sure to include your name, date, and title of assignment. Complete your IRAC of the case you choose using the IRAC Method Template provided. Review the IRAC Method Lecture to properly IRAC the case you have chosen. Grading will be based on the IRAC Assignment Rubric.

Total Possible Points: 25

ATTACHMENTS

  1. IRAC Method Lecture
  2. IRAC Method Template

Answer preview for Analyze Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders and explain how sexual harassment can lead to resignation that resulted in a constructive

APA

507 Words