Why is theological terminology (e.g. “jihad”) not useful in understanding/analyzing the Al-Qaeda or ISIS terrorism? Do we need a

Why is theological terminology (e.g. “jihad”) not useful in understanding/analyzing the Al-Qaeda or ISIS terrorism? Do we need a

Learning Goal: I’m working on a international law question and need support to help me learn.

Requirements:

 You must write 500 words to address each question (a total of 2000 words)

 Must be well-written

 You must read and understand the materials that I provided to have a well-thought answer for each question

 You must use the resources that I provided only

 MLA Format, 12 font, single-spaced, one-inch margins.

Note: The questions & materials will be provided to you

Requirements: 1-2   |   .doc file

Hello,there

Question 1: Why is theological terminology (e.g. “jihad”) not useful in understanding/analyzing the Al-Qaeda or ISIS terrorism? Do we need a new term instead of “jihad”?

Question 2: To what extent, the historical events including artificial borders, colonial past, the Arab-Israeli war, and Western military deployment in the Muslim countries, would suffice to create enough impetus for recruitment into jihadi-militant groups?

Question 3: What are the most important concepts used by a majority of jihadist scholars in constructing the theological framework of the jihadi-terrorism doctrine? What are the challenges and dilemmas they face in devising the doctrine about indiscriminate killing?

Question 4: What factors explain the emergence and (relative) robustness of the Islamist proto-states out of the chaos of the civil wars (in Afghanistan and Somalia)?

Answer preview for Why is theological terminology (e.g. “jihad”) not useful in understanding/analyzing the Al-Qaeda or ISIS terrorism? Do we need a

MLA

2397 Words